|
Ohio Valley Dog Owners, Inc.Protecting dogs, dog owners and our neighbors
|

A coalition of dog clubs, dog-related businesses,
and individual dog lovers in the Ohio River Valley dedicated
to responsible dog ownership and to reasonable laws that protect dogs, dog owners,
and our neighbors.
Membership is open to clubs, individuals, and dog-related businesses.
New taxes and demands for Ohio dog ownersALERT!! Amendments to HB 446 will be presented at the committee hearing in Room 313 (the Finance Hearing Room) on May 8 at 8:30 a.m. in the Capitol Building in Columbus. Call (614) 466-9690 for details.
The bill is available at http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_HB_446 |
Breeder licensing bills gain opposition in OhioTestimony on SB 173 was heard on April 24 and April 30. A substitute bill is listed on the May 6 committee agenda, but no testimony will be taken at that hearing. Date is May 6, time is 10 a.m. in the Senate South Hearing Room in the Capitol Building in Columbus. Call (614) 466-8072 on Monday to make sure the substitute bill is still on the agenda. HB 223/
SB 173 place high financial & regulatory burdens on owners with
more than 8 dogs regardless of kennel conditions.
Does USDA do it better? October 11, 2007: SB 223 opponents packed two hearing rooms in the bill's third hearing before the Ohio State Government & Elections Committee. Read the OVDO testimony. |
|
The judges speak: Toledo's pit bull restrictions pass court musterWill the decision encourage lawmakers to rewrite the state's unconstitutional vicious dog law? Or will breed restrictions and bans continue to proliferate? Several Ohio cities have already opted for breed bans or restrictions, but Cincinnati is considering repeal of its ban because it does not work. The plaintiff in the case petitioned the US Supreme Court for a hearing, but the petition was denied.Meanwhile, HB 366 proposes to drop 'pit bull' from state law but allow cities to pass breed-specific ordinances. |
In
the hopper
|
Louisville plaintiffs file summary judgement petition in federal courtPlaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Louisville City Council rewrite of the city's dangerous dog law have asked a federal court to decide in its favor without hearing further arguments. Lawyers for the Louisville Kennel Club and other plaintiffs filed a summary judgement petition that argues that several provisions of the law are unconstitutional and that these provisions make the remaining language of the law impossible to enforce. The filing also takes issue with the city's hiring of veterinarian Gilles Miloche as the director of its animal control division as illegal under Kentucky law. Dr. Meloche not only is not a US citizen as required by law, but he is also ineligible to become a peace officer in Kentucky on other grounds according to the petition. |
|
See these NAIA articles for more information: From firearms to Fido: "Feel Good" Laws Make Things Worse, and the NAIA Guide to Pet Friendly Ordinances |
OVDO
home page Contact Ohio Valley Dog Owners at
ovdog01@canismajor.com